🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government is shut down because political disagreements regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. How medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, an employee earning moderate income pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you compare it to what average American pays. I can name multiple clients who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

In the US, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. Similar to much of federal military, technology, social programs and transportation services, the system should be outsourced by private contractors instead of a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation is that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.